I’m not about to jump into this because it’s not my fight. That said, if people on either side were as passionate about Jesus as they are about defending their position regarding the shape of the earth, we’d be cooking with rocket fuel. That we allow such things to bring division to the body of Christ shows our level of immaturity, and if this is the best we’ve got, when the devil starts throwing some persecution into the mix and focusing on the church exclusively, mass casualties will be the best we could hope for.
It seems as though every other day, there’s some new thing
that is used as a wedge to separate believers from other believers because the
enemy knows that the more isolated you are, the easier of a target you will
make.
We’re watching people lose their cool in real time over what
was supposed to be a brotherly debate over an issue that has become contentious
all of a sudden, as though if you were living a life of surrender and obedience
to God and fell on the wrong side of this one issue, you’d be barred from the
halls of heaven forevermore.
But you don’t get it, brother Mike, this is really important.
It may be important to you; I’m not disputing that, but is it as important to
God? I’m old enough to remember the head-covering battle royals of my country
and how divisive that issue became. The first division was whether a woman’s hair
could be her head covering, not requiring an actual piece of cloth. Once those
two teams were firmly set against each other, it bisected from there into
myriad niches and interpretations.
Even among those who agreed that head coverings were
biblical, there were micro factions that insisted it must be tied in the front
and not the back, it must be a specific size, and it shouldn’t draw the eye
with colors or other such unholy vestiges like landscapes or sunrises. Some
even went so far as to insist the sisters wear the coverings to bed since the
presence of angels could take place at any moment. Once you’re off on a tangent,
it’s easy to spiral.
They took one thing that is arguably debatable as far as
biblical foundation is concerned, then went about creating laws upon laws that
were nowhere to be found in the Word of God.
I don’t care what the topic is; if it takes the focus off
Jesus and becomes its own competing pursuit, it’s wrong and unbiblical. Yes,
even prophecy, because I’ve known people who were so consumed with prophecy
that they’d neglected their relationship with Christ to the point of no longer
spending time in fellowship with Him.
If we’re at each other’s throats over this, how will we react
when there is a constant drone of Here is the Christ, or There is the Christ,
and you have to tell people it’s not really Him and that He warned us as much.
The deception’s just begun, and it will ramp up
exponentially. Our singular focus must be Jesus, learning to know His voice,
hear His voice, and obey His voice.
We’re not watching for the things Jesus said we should be
watching for, we’re not doing the things Jesus said we should be doing, but we
are gung-ho about scratching at each other over something that will not
determine in the least whether you spend eternity in His presence, or the outer
darkness.
Somehow, we’ve gone from he who is not against us is on our
side to if you don’t agree with me on every issue, tangential and tertiary as
it might be, then you are Ichabod, and there is no redemption for you. By the
way, that whole he who is not against us is for us thing was said by Jesus, in
case anyone was wondering.
But it’s important to me! Samson’s hair was important to him,
but he didn’t make a doctrine out of long hair. Not everyone was required to
take the Nazarite vow just because Samson had. We’re taking personal
convictions and broadening them as general doctrine for everyone, then weaving
in the notion of our personal conviction being a salvific issue to boot.
What is doctrine has been established. Salvific issues are
clearly defined in the Word of God. Why are we so intent on looking for more
and more things to divide us?
If we’re both standing in front of a painting of flowers no
more than two feet apart, we will have a different perspective and see it from
a different angle, but we can both agree that it’s a painting of flowers. If
I’m seeing flowers and you’re seeing elephants, then one of us needs to get
their eyes checked.
I don’t think today’s average Christian appreciates just how
bad it’s going to get in this world, or if they do have an inkling, they’ve
been convinced they won’t be here for any of it. When Jesus said those days would
be shortened for the elect’s sake, it was not because they ate too much pie and
had upset tummies.
And that’s another thing: the reality that those days will be
shortened for the elect’s sake is the Gordian knot that no one’s been able to
untie or explain away. If we’re not here, why does it matter how bad things
get? If we’re not present, why would those days be shortened for our sake?
This world is about to be shaken like a snow globe in the grip of someone in the throes of an epileptic seizure. Rather than focus on being spiritually ready for that eventuality, here we are, trying to poke each other in the eye with sharp sticks for no other reason than to defend our position.
With love in Christ,
Michael Boldea, Jr.
So good!
ReplyDeleteI've always taken the verse that 'the days will be shortened for the elect's sake' at face value but lately I've begun to wonder if there is a deeper meaning. Given how reprobated and off track the modern Church has become, acquiescing and compromising with the basest of sin, what if it also means the days will be shortened to stop the bleeding? Just over thinking here.
ReplyDeleteBut, of course, you are correct about those who believe they don't have to know what the mark is because they won't be here are in for some heart stopping times. When someone pushes me about that I refer to Revelation 20:4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
I ask - if the elect are gone, who is left to refuse to worship the beast or take the mark? I say, better figure it out or be left on the other side of the closed door like the five foolish virgins.