Job 18:5-9, “The light of the wicked indeed goes out, and the flame of his fire does not shine. The light is dark in his tent, and his lamp beside him is put out. The steps of his strength are shortened, and his own counsel casts him down. For he is cast into a net by his own feet, and he walks into a snare. The net takes him by the heel, and a snare lays hold of him.”
Generally speaking, what Bildad was saying was not untrue. In
this particular instance, because what he was saying was targeted at Job, a man
whom God deemed blameless and upright, it was. We can’t broad-brush every situation
and draw conclusions based on historical precedent. There are times when exceptions
to the well-established rules arise, and if we harden our hearts and shut up
our ears, refusing to hear those we are accusing, we just might be judging
wrongly, and inconsistently with the heart of God.
But I’m just defending the truth, brother! It may be that it’s
how you see it, but you’re insinuating that because the light of the wicked
goes out, and the flame of his fire does not shine, and this is occurring in
real time to someone, they must be in the camp of the wicked, and you allow for
no other explanation.
There are absolute truths we must defend to our dying breath,
such as Jesus being the way, the truth, and the life, and that no man can come
to the Father but by Him, but defending these truths and insisting upon someone’s
wickedness because they are suffering or going through a trial are two separate
issues. When we’re quick to accuse, assume, insist, and insinuate upon another’s
sin or wickedness, yet become timid and reticent to defend the name of Jesus,
it’s not only telling, but something that ought to be so alarming to us that we
search our hearts and see if there are any deep-seated issues we must deal
with.
It’s easy to kick a man while he’s down because odds are he
can’t defend himself. You don’t run the risk of getting bruised, beaten, or
vanquished by lashing out against someone who is defenseless, as you would if
you stood toe to toe with the enemy of your soul. It takes a special kind of
cruelty to relish the thought of heaping scorn upon someone who’s already
scraping the bottom of the barrel when it comes to hope, but some souls feel vindicated
in doing so, believing that they will be deemed more righteous still if they
gleefully kick at the man lying in the dirt waiting to die.
There is something to be said for extending grace to those
who are at their wits' end. I’m not talking about condoning sin, but rather
about not jumping to conclusions and insisting that someone has sinned just
because they are going through a season of trial. These are two separate
issues, and while we are to confront sin in the camp, expose it, and tear it
out from the root, it is unbiblical to become the accuser of the brethren
because we’ve concluded that wickedness must exist because otherwise the
individual in question would not be tested to such extremes.
If you can’t tell the difference, if you don’t know which is
which, silence is your best course of action until the evidence supports your
conclusion on the matter. If no evidence is forthcoming, then you must allow
for the very real possibility that there is no wickedness, and what is occurring
is something beyond your understanding.
This isn’t communist Russia. Our position ought not to be ‘show
me the man, and I’ll show you the crime’, but rather ‘Lord, shed light on this
matter, and let your heart be my heart in this situation.’
To Bildad and his friends, being right was the only thing
that mattered. They took their initial impression of the situation and built a
case against Job to confirm their prejudices, not allowing for his words, his
pleas, his tears, and his prayers to sway them because it wasn’t about whether
or not Job had sinned, but rather proving that he had sinned because they
deemed he had.
Some people will continue to insist they are right even when
they’re proven wrong because allowing for the possibility that they misread a
situation, that there was a blind spot in their understanding, or that they
jumped to conclusions before there was clarity is incomprehensible to them.
About two years into our marriage, my wife and I were living in
Romania, and one day, I got a call from my dad asking if I could go pick up a
cousin of mine at the train station. My dad’s entire family lived on the opposite
side of the country, and one of his nieces had decided to visit. Since I had
nothing planned that couldn’t wait, I told him I would and showed up at the
station a few minutes before the train was to arrive.
My cousin got off the train, we hugged, I led her to my car,
and we drove to the orphanage where I knew my dad to be. Within that fifteen-minute
window, someone who knew my wife and me, and had seen me at the station, took
time out of their busy day to hurriedly call my wife and insist that I was
stepping out on her.
“I saw him, Monica. I saw him hug another woman, and they got
in his car and drove away!”
My wife had already gone to work by the time my dad called,
so she didn’t know anything about the cousin or that I had to pick her up from the
train station. Even so, she knew me well enough to know that what I had been
accused of was uncharacteristic of my nature.
The seed had been planted, however, and that night as we were
getting ready for bed she innocently asked, ‘What did you do today?’, to which
I answered, ‘I picked up my cousin from the train station, took her to the
orphanage, spent some time there, then went to dinner with her and my dad.’
The next day, she called the friend who felt the need to call
her and tell her she’d seen me with a strange woman, and explained the
situation, to which the friend answered, ‘That was quick thinking on his part. I’m
sure there’s something more to the story.’
That was the day my wife stopped calling the individual her
friend. Just because you want to be right about someone or something, it doesn’t
mean you are. Be humble enough to admit when you are wrong, if you are wrong,
and wise enough to keep silent before you know all the facts of a given
situation. Wise as they thought themselves to be, by their actions and harsh
words, Job’s friends proved that wisdom had eluded them.
With love in Christ,
Michael Boldea, Jr.
No comments:
Post a Comment