Prophecy VII

 Now to the big question, the one that must be answered, and biblically so, because it will frame the rest of this study: Is prophecy still for today, and if so, what does it look like? By now you already know where I stand. I haven’t been coy or subtle; I’ve shown my hand and made my position clear. For those who may have missed it, yes, I believe God still speaks to His children, engages with His creation, and is intimately aware of all who serve Him in spirit and truth. For Him to keep a running count of the hairs on your head while withholding something as profound as speaking to us through His chosen servants, something He has done since the beginning of creation, is both illogical and contrary to His nature.

It’s one thing to believe something; it’s another to prove it biblically. I’m not here to present you with experientially derived doctrine that was passed down from past generations, nor am I going to lean on anecdotal evidence and personal experience as proof of why I believe what I believe. As always, we will go to the Word, for it has the final say; it is the final authority, and as long as we submit to it, we will know the truth that will make us free.

Since it is one of the most divisive topics within Christendom, I will approach it as lovingly as I am able, while remaining true to Scripture, not taking one verse out of context and pinning all my hopes upon it, but by rightly dividing the Word, studying the entirety of often misquoted passages in context, and using the light of Scripture to guide our path.

It’s not that rational arguments shouldn’t be presented or have a say; one of the strongest is this: if there is no longer true prophecy or prophetic utterance, why is so much of the New Testament focused on warning against false prophets and false prophecy? Would it not have been clearer to declare that these things have ceased, are no more, so any prophecy is, by default, false and should not be weighed, measured, or contrasted with the Word to see if it is of the Lord?

Why would Paul the Apostle encourage the church at Corinth to desire spiritual gifts, especially that they might prophesy, if, by the time the letter reached the church, there would be a window of a handful of years in which they could do as he instructed? It’s not as though Paul finished his letter, clicked send, and the e-mail was delivered to the church staff. There was no FedEx or DHL, so after writing his first letter to the Corinthians, it had to travel from Ephesus to the church at Corinth, about 300 miles away, not by any modern convenience, but by ship and horse; then only after arriving could it be read to the congregation. All told, there was about a ten-year window between Paul writing his first letter to the Corinthians and his death. 

Why is so much time devoted to the outpouring of the Holy Spirit, the operation of the gifts, and the insistence that we should earnestly desire to prophesy, and not forbid speaking in tongues, if that was done away with within a generation and never to be seen again?

Did Peter mispeak on the day of Pentecost when he declared that the promise was to them, to their children, and to all who are afar off, as many as the Lord our God will call? If so, that calls into question the notion of divine inspiration with regard to Scripture itself, does it not? If something as monumentally relevant as the day in which the Holy Spirit was poured out can be muddled by the added opinions of men, wherein Peter declared that this was now the standard, and not a temporary exception to the rule, from generation to generation, a promise God had fulfilled to those who were His, and it was not the case but his added two cents, what does that infer about the inerrancy and infallibility of Scripture?

I believe Scripture is divinely inspired. Therefore, I believe that the Holy Spirit superintended human authors to write His exact message without ambiguity or opacity. It is only when men attempt to inject their opinions and superimpose their doctrinal leanings upon the written text that confusion reigns and everyone ends up doing what is right in their own eyes.

It may come as a surprise, but the doctrine of cessationism is only roughly five hundred years old. For fifteen hundred years after the outpouring of the Holy Spirit, no one even debated whether the gifts of the Holy Spirit were still active and present. As those with a fondness for musty tomes and the writings of the early church fathers can attest, the presence of spiritual gifts was testified to as early as 165 AD, wherein Justin Martyr wrote, “For the prophetical gifts remain with us, even to this present time,” some fifty years after the death of John the Apostle, in 100 AD.

Some people like to pretend there was no church history BC – Before Calvin – but anyone with a willingness to take the time and diligently study it will soon come to realize that there were many notable individuals who devoted their lives to The Way, and throughout the years wrote extensively about brethren in the church who possess prophetic gifting, speak all kinds of languages, and bring to light the secret things of men.

You may recognize some of the names, even after millennia due to the impact they had in leading the early church, from Irenaeus, to Tertullian, Origen, Augustine of Hippo, Francis of Assisi, John Knox, or George Fox, all wrote about ongoing gifts, prophecy, and healing. The presence of the Holy Spirit was never disputed by any of these men, nor were the gifts of the Spirit denounced or censured.

Again, ancient writings and the testimonies of the early church fathers are not evidence in and of themselves. It’s easy to get into the endless back-and-forth of he said, we say, they said, I say, but what is paramount is what the Bible says. What we are doing with this study is building a house, brick by brick, using the Word of God as the foundation. Likewise, at the risk of ruffling some feathers, I do not believe the words of Calvin to be sacrosanct; his words are not gospel; his words are not divine; therefore, I lend them as much weight as I do the words of the aforementioned men who affirmed the spiritual gifts well into the sixteenth century.

One piece of evidence may not sway anyone or convince them beyond a shadow of a doubt, but piece by piece, we are building a body of evidence. Eventually, all the evidence will be presented, the body thereof will be complete, and once it is, my job will be done. What you do with it is on you.  

With love in Christ,

Michael Boldea, Jr.