Prophecy is not a weapon to be wielded by an individual, nor is it something that can be manufactured by the will or desire of man. When Paul writes to the church at Corinth insisting that the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets, it is within the context of church order during fellowship. He neither hints nor insinuates that prophecy has an on-off switch and that, whenever one is so inclined, he starts giving word after word at will, but rather that if one receives a message from the Lord, he can hold his tongue until the appropriate time is presented, without causing confusion or interrupting another.
Context matters. It always has, and it always will. Taking
one verse out of the body text and weaving doctrine from it, outside of it, to
the point that it becomes unrecognizable is not rightly dividing the Word, nor
is it submitting oneself to the authority of Scripture.
I’ve heard the argument often enough that it must be
addressed. Again, when Paul says that the spirits of the prophets are subject
to the prophets, it’s within the context of church order and not an
acknowledgment that the prophet has the authority to tap into his gift as he
wills, as often as he wills, for whatever purpose he wills.
God established order in the church from the onset. When we
stray beyond the boundaries of that order, confusion reigns, and everyone yells
over one another just to be heard. When it comes to prophecy, the text
establishes how it should be carried out within the congregation, the body of
believers, or the household of faith.
1 Corinthians 14:29-32, “Let two or three prophets speak, and
let the others judge. But if anything is revealed to another who sits by, let
the first keep silent. For you can all prophesy one by one, that all may learn
and all may be encouraged. And the spirits of the prophets are subject to the
prophets. For God is not the author of confusion but of peace, as in all the
churches of the saints.”
One aspect of this passage that many gloss over is found in
the first sentence: let the others judge once two or three have spoken. It goes
without saying that the metric used for judging the words is not feelings,
emotions, or personal animus, but rather Scripture, the Word of God, and
whether what was spoken is in harmony with it.
We’ve come to a dangerous time in church history when, simply
because someone declares themselves a prophet of the Lord, everything they say
is deemed true, viable, and, by some, even sacrosanct. If something a
self-proclaimed prophet says is contrary to what Scripture has already
established, they’re in the wrong, always, and without fail.
Such individuals will inevitably twist Scripture to shield
themselves from criticism or being called out, and the most common defense is,
“Do not touch My anointed ones, and do My prophets no harm.” All well and good,
but if a word is demonstrably contrary to what the Bible says, then whether
they are God’s anointed or His prophet must be called into question and
evaluated.
A false prophet cannot use that particular passage as their
defense, because they are, by definition, false. They are neither God’s
anointed nor His prophet. They are wolves who attempt to sow division,
confusion, and doubt into the hearts of the gullible and easily swayed. One of
the enemy’s most-used schemes is to use reimagined, twisted, and out-of-context
Scripture passages to shield himself while undermining it and confusing those
who desire to know the truth so they might be made free.
He offers freedom, wisdom, knowledge, and salvation at a discounted
rate, circumventing the truth of Scripture, and by the time those looking for
the easy path discover it was all an illusion and a lie, it’s too late. There
is no easy path; there is no alternative to the path; there is one path, one
way, one truth, and that is Jesus.
Prophecy is not a vehicle by which certain men are elevated
in status; it is the word of the Lord delivered to whom He chooses, in the
manner He chooses, for the purposes He chooses. I’ve often equated someone
called to the ministry of the prophetic with a mailman. His sole function is to
deliver the letter to the address on the envelope.
I’ve gotten lots of mail over my lifetime. Most of it is junk
mail, offers for windows, doors, credit repair, loans, like most everyone else.
More often than not, you already know the junk from the envelope and chuck it
in the bin without even opening it. Once in a while I get an actual letter, a
piece of mail that matters, but never once has my mailman come into the house,
looked over my shoulder while I was reading a letter, and offered his two cents
as to what the letter meant, or what he thought it was supposed to mean.
Likewise, I’ve never approached my mailman the next day,
letter in hand, asking him what he thought it meant. He did his job. He delivered
my correspondence, and once it was delivered, his job was done. It’s up to me
to decide whether the piece of mail is junk or isn’t, and if I’ve determined it’s
not, it’s my responsibility to read it and understand what it means.
Yes, corporate prophecy, or general prophecy, should be
judged by the others. Judging something is markedly different from interpreting
it. When you judge something, you weigh its veracity; you compare it to
Scripture and see whether they align. When you interpret something, you inject
your opinion and superimpose your thoughts upon something you have no right to
superimpose your thoughts upon. What do you think this word means? How do you
think it will come about? Where do you think we are in the timeline of what was
foretold? I’ve been asked this more times than I can count, and every time I
give an opinion on a matter, I make sure to preface it by saying it is just
that: my opinion. It’s not my job to interpret it, nor is it my job to prattle
on about what I think it means. The message was given, it was delivered, and my
duty is done.
A word of warning for those who are quick to interpret
prophecy and insist that this is what God meant, or this is the timeline: His
thoughts are not your thoughts, and His ways are not your ways. The way we
might see something playing out in our mind’s eye may well turn out to come to
pass in a wholly different manner than we believed. The word of prophecy itself
may be true; what was foretold may come to pass, but the way we saw it playing
out by our inferences and deductions will fall short of the mark because we
added to the word that was given, or took it upon ourselves to insist that we know
the mind of God and the way He would bring it about.
With love in Christ,
Michael Boldea, Jr.
No comments:
Post a Comment