Job 40:1-6, “Moreover the Lord answered Job, and said: ‘Shall the one who contends with the Almighty correct Him? He who rebukes God, let him answer it.’ Then Job answered the Lord and said: ‘Behold, I am vile; what shall I answer You? I lay my hand over my mouth. Once I have spoken, but I will not answer; yes, twice, but I will proceed no further.’”
How does a man
that God described as blameless and upright react upon hearing the voice of God
addressing him personally? Whether it’s Job or Isaiah, when contrasted with the
holiness of God, one saw himself as vile; the other insisted he was a man of
unclean lips, a man undone by the presence of the One he served.
Even though both
men had served God faithfully for years, even though their hearts were pure in
the sight of God, and He saw them as true servants, the moment God made His
presence known, they saw themselves in the light of His righteousness and
couldn’t help but conclude that there was no comparison.
There was no
familiarity; nobody in the Bible attempted to high-five God, braid His beard,
sit on His throne, or challenge Him to a game of backgammon. The holiness and
omnipotence of God demanded the humbling of one’s very being, because they
understood who was addressing them, whose voice they had heard, and faithful as
they were, blameless and upright as they were, the magnitude of God’s holiness
brought them low.
One of the
reasons I am ever skeptical of individuals who claim to have wandered the halls
of heaven and shared a rainbow sherbet with God is the utter lack of holy reverence,
holy fear, and holy awe. Are you telling me there was no reaction similar to
Job or Isaiah as you stood before the Almighty? You got to look into His eyes
while Moses had to turn his back, for as God said, “no man shall see Me and
live?”
What you are
inferring is that you exceed the uprightness of Job, Isaiah, and Moses put
together, and that you are the singular exception in the history of mankind
given that God went back on His own word and allowed you to not only see Him
face to face, but sit on His lap, toy with His beard, and have a familiarity
with Him that none other claimed to have.
If that’s the
claim you’re making, just come out and say it. Don’t be coy; don’t allow others
to draw that conclusion based on your insinuations, then when called on the
carpet for the claims you made, obfuscate and act demure, insisting that you
never said those things yourself; people just assumed them.
You’re attempting
to play games with a God who doesn’t. You’re attempting to elevate your status
by claiming things you’ve never experienced, speaking words God has never
spoken, and appropriating authority that was never yours to appropriate.
Perhaps the best
course of action would be to imitate Job, lay your hand over your mouth, and be
silent. It is a profound thing to consider and contemplate: the one man that
God deemed blameless and upright in his generation saw himself as vile in the
light of God’s presence, His voice, and His holiness.
It’s only on
extremely rare occasions that men see themselves as less rather than more of
what they truly are. Whether it’s more faithful, wise, knowledgeable, or
righteous, men usually round up rather than round down. The see themselves in a
more positive light than objectively deserved, then in what soon becomes an
endless loop of self-aggrandizement, they use that positive assessment of
themselves to elevate their status in their own minds, excusing behaviors
otherwise looked down upon and condemned by the Word, because if God deemed it
so bad they wouldn’t see themselves as being so righteous, take one step further
away from truth and light, and the cycle begins anew again.
Was Job truly
vile? Had Elihu and Job’s three friends been right all along? Was his love for
God just a pretense? Was he putting on airs for the sake of saving face? In
light of how God viewed him, and being told that Job never sinned with his
lips, it’s unlikely, but that’s how he saw himself in the moment when God
addressed him. That’s how he viewed all that he had done, because it wasn’t man
striving for God any longer, but God striving with man.
God had thrown
down the gauntlet, addressed Job specifically, and the only response Job had to
hand was to say, “Behold, I am vile; what shall I answer you?” Then immediately
he laid his hand over his mouth.
Those who fault
God, who insist that He has treated them unfairly, that He fell short of
righteous judgment regarding some issue or another, would have the wind knocked
out of their sail in an instant if God were to turn their gaze upon them and
ask that they substantiate their claims.
Feelings and
facts are distinctly different and separate from each other. They are not
interchangeable, nor can you claim something is fact when it is a feeling.
Conversely, you cannot accuse someone of being emotional, or reacting based on
feelings when facts have been presented to them, and they are unwilling to
contend with the matter with objective intellectual honesty.
Job knew two
things at this point: first, that God had addressed him personally, and second,
in light of His holiness, the only thing he could say was, “Behold, I am vile;
what shall I answer You?”
In the end, Job
was just a man. Blameless and upright he might have been, diligently fearing
the Lord and shunning evil, but he was flesh and bone, sinew and blood, now
having the God of the universe addressing him, with the light of God’s holiness
making any measure of it Job may have achieved seem vile in comparison.
No man can stand
before God in his own righteousness. No man can insist that by their merit,
their labors, their adherence to a particular set of practices, they have no
need of the atoning, redemptive blood of Jesus to wash them and make them
clean. All fall short of the glory of God, and though he was singularly blameless
and upright in his generation, so did Job. Now all he could do was humble
himself in the sight of the Lord, with sincerity of heart and purpose, understanding
that God owed him no answers, but in His love He would nevertheless provide them.
With love in Christ,
Michael Boldea, Jr.
No comments:
Post a Comment